• Register
  • Help
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Topic: Why We Must Leave Iraq

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Ojai, California
    Posts
    305

    Why We Must Leave Iraq

    sponsored links


    ***Advertisments***
    Why We Must Leave Iraq
    by Larry C. Johnson
    Sometimes in life there are no good options. It is part of our nature to always assume that we can fix a problem. But in life there are many problems or situations where there is no pleasant solution. If you were at the Windows on the World Restaurant in the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 9 am on September 11, 2001 you had no good options. You could choose to jump or to burn to death. Some choice.

    A hard, clear-eyed look at the current situation in Iraq reveals that we are confronted with equally bad choices. If we stay we are facilitating the creation of an Islamic state that will be a client of Iran. If we pull out we are likely to leave the various ethnic groups of Iraq to escalate the civil war already underway. In my judgment we have no alternative but to pull our forces out of Iraq. Like it or not, such a move will be viewed as a defeat of the United States and will create some very serious foreign policy and security problems for us for years to come. However, we are unwilling to make the sacrifices required to achieve something approximating victory. And, what would victory look like? At a minimum we should expect a secular society where the average Iraqi can move around the country without fear of being killed or kidnapped. That is not the case nor is it on the horizon.

    We may even be past the point of no return where we could impose changes that would put Iraq back on course to be a secular, democratic nation without sparking a major Shiite counteroffensive. Therefore the time has come to minimize further unnecessary loss of life by our troops and re-craft a new foreign and security policy for the Middle East.

    The Current Situation

    Iraq has devolved into a tripartite state, split among the Kurds in the North, the Shias in the South, and Sunni tribes in the middle. While things are relatively peaceful in the North and South, the central part of Iraq is in the grips of a defacto civil war. Most of the trained and deployed Iraqi police and military forces are Shia. Most of their operations are directed against Sunni targets. The Sunnis do not feel that they have a legitimate voice in the political process. As a result they have decided to fight.

    The Shia majority, long oppressed in Iraq, are not willing, nor likely, to relinquish their new status as the tops dogs. They are receiving significant intelligence, economic, and political support from the Islamist government in Iran. The Shia also are well positioned to control a significant portion of Iraq's vast oil resources. They are not likely to share this wealth with the Sunnis.

    There is no effective national government in Iraq. The current group meeting inside the Green Zone to draft the constitution has no real clout. True power is held by tribal chieftains and religious leaders scattered around country. Those leaders are playing both sides of the fence--keeping a toe in the political negotiations in Baghdad while providing money and protection to insurgents.

    The insurgency in Iraq is comprised of at least 20 groups. Some of these are Baathists, some are Sunni Islamic extremists, and a few are Shia. They agree on one thing--the United States is an invader and must be expelled. While there is no single leader who can claim the status or mandate as did Ho Chi Minh during the Vietnam days, the insurgents in Iraq are as firm and serious as those we faced in Vietnam.

    The continued presence of U.S. combat forces and our operations against Iraqi civilians is recruiting new jihadists from around the Muslim world. Notwithstanding U.S. efforts to win the “hearts and minds” of the Iraqi people, the sectarian strife and the images of U.S. soldiers kicking in the doors of peoples’ homes while searching for insurgents is creating more anger rather than support.

    The Sunni insurgents have control of the battlefield in the central belt of Iraq. Even today the United States military cannot keep a six mile stretch of highway open that runs from downtown Baghdad to the International Airport. U.S. diplomatic personnel and many key Iraqi Government officials live inside a security ghetto known euphemistically as the Green Zone. Even during the bleakest days of the war in South Vietnam, U.S. diplomats and soldiers could travel freely around Saigon without fear of being killed in bomb blast or kidnapped. We don't have that luxury in Baghdad.

    Options?

    We could potentially defeat the Sunni insurgents if we were willing and able to deploy sufficient troops to control the key infiltration routes that run along the Tigris and Euphrates River valleys. But we are neither willing nor able. It would require at least 380,000 troops devoted exclusively to that mission. Part of that mission would entail killing anyone who moved into controlled areas, such as roadways. In adopting those kinds of rules of engagement we would certainly increase the risk of killing innocent civilians. But, we would impose effective control over those routes. That is a prerequisite to gaining control over the insurgency.

    We cannot meet the increased manpower requirements in Iraq without a draft. We do not currently have enough troops in the Army and the Marine Corps to supply and sustain that size of force in the field. But, even with a draft, we would be at least 15 months away from having the new batch of trained soldiers ready to deploy. More importantly, there is no political support for a draft. In other words, we're unwilling to do what is required to even have a shot at winning.

    While the insurgency is not likely to acquire sufficient strength to fight and defeat our forces directly in large set piece battles, they do have the wherewithal to destroy infrastructure and challenge our control of lines of communication. The ultimate test of a government's legitimacy is whether or not it can protect its citizens from threats foreign and domestic. Thus far the Iraqi Government has made scant progress on this front. Today's attack in central Baghdad, by a uniformed unit of masked insurgents, represents another disturbing milestone in the continued growth of the insurgency. One of these days we should not be surprised when an insurgent force breaches the Green Zone and takes some U.S. diplomats hostage.

    An ideal, but unlikely outcome, is that the secularists, who are trying desperately to craft a legitimate government, will persuade a sufficient number of Shia and Sunni leaders to turn their back on a religious-based government. Unfortunately, they don't control weapons or militia. Force remains the ultimate means for deciding a country's fate. In this case the guns are in the hands of those who favor an Islamic state over a secular nation.

    If the United States tries to intervene now to compel power sharing on behalf of Sunni interests we are likely to trigger a backlash by the Shia majority. Mullahs like Moqtada al Sadr have demonstrated that they can mobilize combat units to kill Americans when their interests are challenged.

    There are some indications that once we are out of the picture that the insurgency will turn on itself. As noted earlier a significant portion of the insurgents are not Islamic extremists. There is evidence that the different groups will fight each other. Sunni tribal chiefs are not likely to cede control of their territory to foreign Islamists once the United States is no longer on the scene. Our departure will likely lead to a brutal civil war, but such a war creates opportunities for the United States where it can rebuild its credibility with those forces who represent modernity and secular progress.

    So What's Next?

    Staying the course and enduring further casualties while the insurgency grows stronger is an insane policy. If we persist on that front we will end up strengthening the hand of Islamic extremists and their role within the Iraqi insurgency.

    Our choice is simple--either we invest in the military resources and personnel required to defeat the Sunni insurgents and allow the Shia and Kurds to consolidate power or we withdraw and let the Shia, Sunni, and Kurds find their own solution. We cannot ask our soldiers and Marines to give their lives and sacrifice their bodies for a new Islamic state. It is true that our withdrawal will create a major vacuum and damage our prestige. But the alternative, i.e., that we stay and try to train up sufficient Iraqi forces and help the fledgling Islamic Government get on its feet, will leave us the favorite target of insurgents and terrorists. And after we have shed the blood of our sons and daughters in trying to create a new government that will be controlled by Islamists, those Islamists will ultimately insist that we leave Iraq and no longer meddle in their affairs.

    Rosy scenario does not live in Iraq. Until we come to grips with this truth American soldiers will continue to be killed and maimed for no good reason.

    Larry C. Johnson is a former Deputy Director of the U.S. State Departments Office of Counter Terrorism, who has spoken out for censure of Bush. Earlier, he worked for the Central Intelligence Agency and is an expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security and crisis and risk management. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international firm that helps multinational corporations and financial institutions identify strategic opportunities, manage risks, and counter threats posed by terrorism and money laundering. He is a Republican who supported and raised funds for George W. Bushs 2000 presidential campaign.

  2. #2

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    ...sure is quiet in here.
    ;-0

    Jim Jarnagin - no not THAT Jim Jarnagin, the other one.

  3. #3

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    Apparently, nobody has any dirt on Larry C. Johnson. Yet.

    -JF

  4. #4

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    My guess is that it's quiet because none of us knows enough about the situation to comment. His appraisal may well be right - although one has to wonder how he can just say that we need "at least 380,000" troops to do what he says needs doing.

    I wonder whether just dividing it into three independent states like it was originally wouldn't be the best thing to do. Turkey doesn't want a Kurdish state, but how badly do we need their allegiance?

    Or maybe we should make Iraq a Turkish province again like it was before WWI!

    ***

    Regardless, both the Legislative and Executive branches of our government need firing and new people voted in. They've failed us miserably - especially the Republicans, but also the Democrat wimps who voted for this war. It was totally obvious that this was what was going to happen. Even Colin Powell - another wimp - is reputed to have said "if you break it you've bought it."

  5. #5

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Batzdorf
    Regardless, both the Legislative and Executive branches of our government need firing and new people voted in. They've failed us miserably - especially the Republicans, but also the Democrat wimps who voted for this war. It was totally obvious that this was what was going to happen. Even Colin Powell - another wimp - is reputed to have said "if you break it you've bought it."
    Quite true about both parties. I was very disappointed by Colin Powell, and at the same time ashamed to say that he had me 90% convinced the day he made that speech at the UN, which I watched live...but not quite enough that I wanted us to go down that road without the full support of the UN.

    But now we're there...so how far does our responsibility go? Do we you think that because "we broke it, we own it" (to paraphrase) and must stay on, no matter how many lives it costs? Or is our presence merely delaying a fight between the three groups that will happen as soon as we leave anyway (as it did when the Soviets left the Balkans)?

    We're two years in now and things are getting worse every day (if you take the time to look outside the mainstream press, that is). For god's sake, we can't even control the road to the airport anymore!

    The arguments that Bush is currently making, more or less that "we owe it those who have given their lives", yada, yada, make me sick to my stomach.

    Jim Jarnagin - no not THAT Jim Jarnagin, the other one.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Ojai, California
    Posts
    305

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    Yeah. If this administration were moral and honest I would think it would be best to stay in Iraq for some time.

    But this administartion is the cheif cause of the sufferring and death that that poor country has had to endure and I cant but bellieve that anything we do there at this point, given this country's true motives, can only make it worse than the total hell, one way or another, Iraq is bound to endure for quite sometime.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Budleigh Salterton
    Posts
    1,477

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Batzdorf
    My guess is that it's quiet because none of us knows enough about the situation to comment.
    Television and newpapers are very narrow view windows - that's part of the issue here.

  8. #8

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    Yes, although not as narrow as the propaganda we're fed about how the evil media is only reporting on the bad stuff to the exclusion of the progress we're making.

    But a big part of the reason for the serious journalism outlets being narrow - not the corporate media, the serious outlets like BBC - is that the place is such a disaster, they can't stray far enough from their caves to report on it.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Budleigh Salterton
    Posts
    1,477

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    The BBC is, and always has been a left-wing organisation as far back as I can remember.

  10. #10

    Re: Why We Must Leave Iraq

    Yes, their intelligence is evident in their quality.

Go Back to forum
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •